Jeezus, Mona, could you select a more complex topic to dissect for inspiration than the meaning of art? Frankly, I find it easier to discuss evolution versus intelligent design creationism, or wearing white after labor day. The meaning is too complicated, too divisive, and dammit just too difficult to explain.
For starters, it’s damn subjective. By nature, everyone’s opposing ideas invalidates everyone else’s opposing idea. If all these views are meritless by the nature of opposition, where does that leave us? Clearly, we are left to converge in a cluster-fuck crises on existentialism. Sounds pleasant, doesn’t it?
The catalyst of this debate can be found here. The argument is exceedingly compact. The secret to a good divisive topic is keeping your points compact. The longer you spend engaged in superfluous validation the greater your chances of invalidating your own diatribe.
I lack the server space required to adequately analyze the platitudes set forth by others in this field with extra consonants accompanying their last names preceded by a comma, I will preface this as op-ed. The opinions herein are not assigned to any other entities. The passionate words which follow reflects only the opinion of this cat. If said statements resemble your opinions, congratulations, you too have joined the ranks of self-assurance rivaled only by politicians doing the ineffective wide stance squat in airport bathroom stalls.
Art is not a velvet Elvis painting. Art is a stray mark on a slab of driveway left by a three year-old.
Art is not pornography. Art is the erotic portrayal of human beings at their most emotionally vulnerable even if they are disrobed.
Art is not a cardboard cut-out of an eight-year-old peeing in a flower bed. Art is the name of a brave man who talked to outspoken kids in the presence of an audience.
Art is the successful merger of creativity and happenstance. All creative attempts do not yield art. I have boxes of failures, but they are have failed only in their execution as art. They are an integral part of the process. The journey teaches more than the destination.
Art can be rigid, and uniform, but I disagree with the notion the highest forms are film and pure mathematics. Film requires little participation from the audience. Where is the connection? Film is comparable to person standing up in a crowded room and pronouncing himself, art. Mathematics can be a logical starting place or art, but I don’t consider it a recipe for results, with the possible exception of pi, in all its endless non-repetitive glory.
Art is tangible, yet untouchable, passionate yet reserve, breaking some rules yet conforming to others, offers coping value beyond measure yet the first activity to lose funding.
Posted by clawless
Posted by clawless 



Posted by clawless 

